29 pages • 58 minutes read
Henry David ThoreauA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Ethos is a rhetorical device that attempts to establish the validity of an opinion by bolstering the character or authority of its holder. Thoreau’s plea for John Brown utilizes the strategy of ethos to persuade his audience of Brown’s credibility, “correct[ing] the tone and the statements of the newspapers respecting his character and actions” (1). The essay charts Brown’s moral lineage, showing him to be a trustworthy and peaceful man resolved to fight only “a war for liberty” (2) because of “his magnanimity” (31). The essay recursively promotes the heroism of Brown’s men, the discernment with which Brown chose them, and the discipline with which they acted. Thoreau also argues for a religious view of Brown as embodying the Christian ideal with “a spark of divinity in him” (62). This appeal to his moral character escalates further as Thoreau calls Brown an “angel of light” (68), arguing that Brown’s views of his actions should trump those of the government that convicted him and the newspapers that denounced him.
To answer the question of whether Brown should be considered a terrorist or a freedom fighter, Thoreau utilizes figurative language to pinpoint aspects of his character. Thoreau describes Brown’s virtue as “clear as a cloudless sky,” and “true as the voice of nature” (70), intending to portray Brown’s moral forthrightness. To refute accusation that Brown was driven by “transient impulse” (12), Thoreau paints Brown’s anger as “a volcano with an ordinary chimney-flue” (12), implying that it was powerful but controlled and purposeful rather than wild.
Thoreau uses historical, literary, and religious allusions to bolster Brown’s standing. He refers to the Tennyson poem “The Charge of the Light Brigade,” which honors the “perfect machine” of soldiers following even a “blundering command” (22); equally courageously, Brown believed he acted on the perfect command of God. Brown is repeatedly juxtaposed to heroes of bygone eras. Thoreau describes him a man of “Spartan habits,” calling to the audience’s mind the ascetic martial discipline of Spartan society, implying that Brown exhibited the same level of discipline within his violence. Brown is also favorably ranked to heroes of the American Revolutionary War; Thoreau hopes Brown will have a more lasting impact on history: “Ethan Allen and Stark, with whom he may in some respects be compared, were rangers in a lower and less important field” (6). Thoreau downplays the legacies of so-called great men of history, such as George Washington and Benjamin Franklin, who will “deliquesce like fungi” (59), eclipsed by figures like Brown who realized the goal of emancipation.
Thoreau’s speech employs language reminiscent of biblical texts to further the power and forcefulness of his words. Polysyndeton, the formal inclusion of redundant conjunctive words such as “and” and “or,” occurs throughout the speech, such as when Thoreau applauds Brown’s own oratorical style thus, “In his case there is no idle eloquence, no made, nor maiden speech, no compliments to the oppressor” (43). The parallel phrases emphasize and build Thoreau’s critique of those whose speech seems too fresh or tailor-made, their pattern working like a drumbeat of accusation.
Thoreau also uses a device that is the opposite of polysyndeton—asyndeton, which omits conjunctions for brevity, giving the impression of breathless excitement, increased urgency, and frankness. This contributes to the sense of authenticity when Thoreau describes Brown’s troops as “men of simple habits, straightforward, prayerful; not thinking much of rulers who did not fear God” (8). The elision of any connecting words between the adjectives lends a folksy directness to Thoreau’s words, highlighting the men’s status as salt of the earth.
Polemic is a strong, critical attack in support of a particular viewpoint. Thoreau’s speech attempts to match Brown’s forceful rhetoric, and he lambasts many people and publications by name. The earnestness of Thoreau’s polemical style is meant to stir up conflict. For example, he accuses newspapers of deliberate bias when omitting parts of Brown’s speeches and then calling him unhinged: “I have no respect for the penetration of any man who can read the report of [Brown’s] conversation, and still call the principal in it insane” (45). Thoreau is equally provocative about the US government, which he accuses of fraud, calling it “a counterfeiting law-factory” (67). Finally, Thoreau calls on his audience to consider whether they’ve done enough for their lives to matter: “Do you think you are going to die sir? No! There’s no hope of you. You haven’t got your lesson yet” (59). These words are meant to rile up listeners, convey Thoreau’s emotions and the frustration that he felt in confronting slavery, and urge others to action.
By Henry David Thoreau