43 pages • 1 hour read
Nicholas D. Kristof , Sheryl WuDunnA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
This refers to programs and methods that take place before a problem occurs in an effort to prevent it. Many of these focus on the early stages of a child’s development to try to prevent negative consequences or to improve the child’s circumstances later in life. This applies even to the prenatal period when the fetus develops in the womb. An example of early intervention is working to ensure that pregnant mothers do not use alcohol or drugs and do not smoke cigarettes. Each has a harmful effect on the development of the baby’s brain that will negatively affect them as children and even adults. Babies born to mothers who abused alcohol, for example, are born with a condition known as fetal alcohol syndrome. They are more likely to have substance abuse problems themselves and “often have trouble with memory, with thinking, with impulse control—and with the criminal justice system” (51). The book emphasizes the importance of early intervention as being more effective and cheaper than programs designed to help people after a problem has already occurred. For example, the authors write that one study estimated the lifetime costs for a single child born with fetal alcohol syndrome to be $800,000.
This term is used often in the book as the authors focus on evidence-based research to support ideas and identify programs and methods that are effective in alleviating a problem. It refers to experiments in which subjects are randomly chosen and allocated to two or more test groups. This avoids what is called “selection bias” or “allocation bias,” which is a distortion of test groups in which the subjects are not representative of the population being tested. The test groups then have different conditions placed upon them—one tested for the factors being examined and the other tested with alternative methods or a placebo. The latter is called the “control group,” against which the other is measured to observe any differences. For example, the founder of the Nurse-Family Partnership, David Olds, conducted a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of home visits by nurses. Families were randomly chosen to either participate or not participate in the program, and both groups were observed and tested on a number of criteria. The differences showed that those who participated had much better outcomes in the areas measured.
This means a for-profit business that focuses on addressing a social problem. The authors explain that such hybrid organizations have begun to spring up in recent years after a long tradition of nonprofit and for-profit entities being very distinct organizations. This can take the form of private companies like Greyston Bakery, founded by Bernard Glassman, which hires homeless people as its employees. As a private business, its mission only has to be approved by Glassman. Still, both aid workers and businesspeople find fault with the model, saying that such an organization is, by definition, contradictory because it blurs its purpose. Glassman’s idea, however, was for Greyston Bakery to be self-sustaining: running on profits and not having to rely on donations to do its work in fighting homelessness.
A social business can also take the form of a corporation addressing a social issue. This is illustrated by the Grameen Danone Foods venture, a partnership between the yogurt company Danone and Grameen Bank, founded by Muhammad Yunus to provide microfinancing. The goal was to fight malnutrition among children in Bangladesh while also providing jobs. Special yogurt containing micronutrients was produced locally and sold to families by women who traveled to rural villages. The idea was to at least break even; Danone did not want to subsidize the project by losing money, but it agreed to forego a profit if the venture could be self-sustaining. Using corporations in this way is more controversial because they are publicly traded and owned by many shareholders. The influential economist Milton Friedman vehemently opposes this model, calling it “fraud” that harms shareholders.
By these authors