logo

25 pages 50 minutes read

Ambrose Bierce

A Horseman in the Sky

Fiction | Short Story | Adult | Published in 1898

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Dehumanizing Effects of War

The war exacts a terrible price on Druse. First, he separates himself from his parents in the final weeks of his mother’s life to join the Union army, becoming a “traitor” (according to his father) to his home state of Virginia. Second, he is forced to choose between killing his father, a Confederate, and endangering his fellow troops. Choosing to protect his comrades, he shoots at his father’s horse, leading to his father’s death, and must live with the pain and guilt of that loss. The ties of home, family, and community are torn asunder by the Civil War.

The motif of statuary, primarily developed through the father, at first signifies the virtues of resilience, firmness, and duty needed by a soldier, but the end of the story reveals the cost for Druse of embracing these ideals: It dehumanizes him. From the outset, the father is described as “leonine” (4), which evokes his authoritative, deliberate, and decisive character. After taking a moment of “silence” in response to his son’s decision to join the Union, he delivers a short speech that at once judges his son a traitor and exhorts him to pursue his “duty” (4), however his son conceives it. The figure the father cuts on horseback, as Druse awakes to see him perched on the cliff, is “straight and soldierly,” with the sureness and “repose of a Greek god carved in [...] marble” (5). At first, Druse mistakes him for a literal statue. But even as he falls to his death, as witnessed by the unnamed officer, the father appears to retain “a firm seat in the saddle” (7) and exhibits “grace and ease and intention” (8), as if still in control of his plummeting horse.

Such qualities of self-control, however, “masked a breaking heart” at his son’s departure from home (5). His emotional life is repressed, a fact evident also in his decision to keep Druse’s mother from knowing his decision to fight for the Union: Her emotions must not be disturbed. Having contemplated the rider as a statue, a figure or representation of a human being rather than a living one, Druse is ready to shoot without a second thought. Physical and figurative distance initially prevent the act from prompting a moral quandary. However, as soon as there is the suggestion of a human bond when the rider turns to look “into his eyes, into his brave, compassionate heart” (6), Druse loses the will to fire and becomes a tumult of emotion.

Eventually, he repeats to himself his father’s exhortation to follow duty (as if it “were a divine mandate” [7]) and regains control. The narrator says, “He was calm now. His teeth were firmly but not rigidly closed; his nerves were as tranquil as a sleeping babe’s” (7). Devotion to duty has rendered him innocent and resolute, an embodiment of the traits of his statuesque father. This state of peace does not last. After he pulls the trigger and sees the result, he does indeed remain motionless, but it is due to the paralysis of trauma, not the quiet of inner peace. He is pale like a Grecian marble, but the reference here evokes the lifelessness of statuary, rather than its capacity to glorify a military past.

Civil War as Patricide

Ambrose Bierce uses the trope of patricide to convey the violence of the Civil War, which left the nation as well as families and individuals deeply scarred. The story concerns the physical and emotional wounds of waging war against one’s fellow citizens and family members, eschewing any discussion of Druse’s ideological reasons for taking up arms (presumably to end slavery and preserve the Union). Who is on which side seems beside the point. While Confederate soldiers were considered “Rebels,” the son rebels against his parents and homeland to join the Union, while the Confederate father stands for loyalty to the state. Division within the family stands for division within the country, calling attention to the personal and individual consequences of national conflict. The story suggests that the consequences are primarily personal and that loyalty to abstract concepts and causes will not save humanity from them.

The father–son relationship echoes the relationship between Hamlet and his stepfather Claudius in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, which also results in patricide. Both Druse and Hamlet delay killing their fathers over uncertainty whether the victim had the opportunity to ask for forgiveness of sins, but their concerns are opposite. Despite having the opportunity to kill Claudius at prayer, Hamlet famously holds back because he does not want to send the usurper to a better afterlife having just settled accounts with God. Druse, by contrast, worries that shooting his father unaware would send him “without a moment’s spiritual preparation [...] to his account” and thus potentially to hell (6). As in Hamlet, the violence within the Druse family is a microcosm of civil strife. Druse may have found a loophole in shooting the horse instead of the rider, creating a sense of distance between himself and the killing, and he may have provided his father time to ready his soul to meet its maker, but whether he is absolved of accountability is doubtful. The allusion to Hamlet highlights the pathos of Druse’s decision (he loves his father, but Hamlet hates his stepfather), while broadening the theme of civil war as patricide—i.e., suggesting it has been a fact of human life for a long time.

Innocence Versus Experience

“A Horseman in the Sky” is a coming-of-age story in which the stakes of youthful rebellion are high and the rewards of knowledge dubious. Druse has led a sheltered life of “ease and cultivation” under “wealthy parents” (4). He rebels against his father and leaves “the home of his childhood to go soldiering” (5). In contrast to his father, Druse is inexperienced and perhaps naive, the term “soldiering” suggesting a glib understanding of war, but youthful rebellion is often part of self-discovery, and Druse has had a successful military career.

The story captures in a microcosm Druse’s journey into fuller awareness by focusing on a single moment in his wartime experience. He begins literally asleep, unaware of the grand landscape around him. He awakes but only gradually brings into focus the physical world. He realizes the figure he first mistakes for a statue is a horseman standing very still. When he recognizes the figure to be a human being (his father, in fact), he experiences a moral dilemma the intensity of which threatens his newly gained awareness: “he shook in every limb, turned faint” (6). Committing himself to his duty to his fellow soldiers clarifies his vision once again: “mind, heart and eyes were clear, conscience and reason sound” (6).

In this state of clarity, he fires his rifle. Bierce does not describe the immediate effect on Druse but does reveal the eventual results: The father falls to his death and Druse is pale, motionless, emotionless, and reluctant to speak. However blameless or honorable Druse’s intentions might have been, the consequences remain brutal and horrific. Ideals have been tested in the light of the unforgiving outcomes of actions done in their names. In the words of the commander to the unnamed officer, has Druse “learned anything of advantage” (8) through this experience? He has seen deeper into the horrors of war, but whether this proves to be “of advantage” to him remains an open question.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text