47 pages • 1 hour read
Nathan ThrallA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Saar Tzur managed to cooperate effectively with Ibrahim Salama despite bitter tensions between their two communities. For months, Tzur’s troops had been under attack by stones and Molotov cocktails, and after failing to deter them through force, he simply asked Ibrahim to intervene on his behalf, and it worked. In his opinion, the construction of the wall also made things easier, especially as his sector had been a favored route for suicide bombers during the height of the Second Intifada, and Israeli casualties had plummeted since the wall’s construction: “The separation barrier was the largest infrastructure project in Israel’s history. At the time of the accident, it was in its tenth year of being built, and the cost had reached nearly $3 billion, more than twice the price of the National Water Carrier” (132). Colonel Dany Tirza was responsible for building it, having spent years designing maps after the Oslo Accords. His family was among the settlers of the West Bank who saw the land as a Biblical inheritance, even if they were not themselves religious. After a Brooklyn-based settler massacred worshippers at a Hebron mosque, the army pushed for strict separation between settlers and Palestinians, without completely undermining the peace process.
The Oslo maps divided the West Bank into three areas: A, cities where the Palestinians had maximal self-determination; B, smaller towns and villages where Palestinians ran local affairs but not security; and C, more rural areas under total Israeli control. The PLO initially rejected this arrangement but ultimately had to concede. However, the Palestinian people remained firm in their rejection and soon broke out into open revolt.
In March 2002, the Second Intifada was at its bloody height, including a suicide attack on Passover that killed over 30 Israelis. Dany, who was in charge of constructing a security barrier, had assumed that the uprising would come and go quickly and initially relied on checkpoints to stop the infiltration of militants into Israeli cities, but this proved insufficient. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s government decided on the need for a separation barrier and was mainly deciding on where exactly to place it. Too narrow a boundary would look like a concession to terrorism, and too broad a barrier would draw international condemnation. Ultimately, it surrounded more than 80% of settlers in the West Bank, until “it formed a giant scar across the land” (145).
Ibrahim Salama had been a champion of the peace process for many years. He had been a longtime member of Fatah, and he endured imprisonment and solitary confinement during the First Intifada. During his confinement, “he began to question his old beliefs, concluding that there was no military solution to the conflict” (148). He would work for the PLO as they, in turn, worked for the Israeli government, confident that the settlement project in the West Bank was a problem that both parties were dedicated to solving.
The Adam settlement was one of the few Jewish settlements populated by Mizrahi Jews from the Middle East and North Africa, generally poorer and of a lesser social status than the Ashkenazis from Eastern Europe. Many Mizrahi suffered great persecution at the hands of the Ashkenazi-dominated government, and once Beber Vanunu glimpsed the settlement communities popping up outside Jerusalem, he committed to building a similar one for his fellow Mizrahi. The government would have preferred that he build a site deeper into the West Bank as part of a strategy to divide and weaken Palestinian communities there, but Beber insisted on building a settlement at Jaba, which he informally called Adam after a Mizrahi officer killed in Lebanon. Beber wanted to be respectful of his Palestinian neighbors, and so when the crash happened near the territory of the settlement, “he got people involved in making a large banner offering condolences from the community of Adam to the families of the children” (153).
During the Second Intifada, Ibrahim Salama struggled to maintain peace between Palestinians and settlers, but this was a fiendishly difficult task. He tried to work with the Economic Cooperation Foundation because he believed that their work “saved lives on both sides” (155), and he worked closely with members of Jewish settlers to urge restraint on both sides. He became close friends with Adi Shepter, a leader of the Anatot settlement, and during one of the tensest moments of the Second Intifada, with the IDF placing Arafat’s headquarters under siege, Adi had Ibrahim’s car pulled over, only to hug him when he emerged.
The most difficult part of the security barrier was around Jerusalem, and the problem was distilled to “how to include as few Palestinians as possible on the Israeli side without conceding an inch of territory” (158). They could exclude Palestinian neighborhoods, but that would risk invalidating the Israeli claim on the territory. They could include the entire area Israel had annexed in 1967, but including so many Palestinians would be extremely complicated. The third option was to keep as much of Jerusalem as possible while cutting off the most densely populated Palestinian neighborhoods, which remained a formal part of Jerusalem even as they found themselves physically excluded and under-serviced. Dany considered depriving the people on the other side of Jerusalem residency, but the government refused to do so for fear that it would concede that territory permanently.
Ibrahim Salama became head of the Interior Ministry for a region with very little access to public services such as ambulances, fire trucks, or police. At the same time, they were excluded from bringing in Palestinian services since the area remained under Israeli jurisdiction. The economy was fragile, and the educational system bordered on non-functionality. With few opportunities, many kids succumbed to drugs:
[T]he most popular was ‘Nice’: marijuana, tobacco, or other herbs covered in chemicals-pesticides, acetone, ether, rat poison—that gave off a high. From there the kids moved on to heroin, which was sold openly in the streets of the camp. The addicts were getting younger and younger, and so were the teens hospitalized for overdoses (163).
Among the unregulated private schools in the region was one that sent a group of kindergarteners on an illegally registered bus to visit an amusement park.
This section takes the furthest step away from the crash (without leaving it behind entirely) to undertake the most systematic review of the structural conditions that ultimately made the crash possible. It is the section in which the theme of Degrees of Culpability of Tragedy is explored most profoundly. As with the previous section, there are no villains on whom personal blame can be placed for the disaster. If anyone should be a villain, it is Dany Tirza, generally regarded as the chief architect of the security barrier that ends up causing so much misery and on which Thrall ends up pouring tremendous scorn. Yet Thrall portrays Tirza mostly sympathetically. There really was an acute security problem in the early 2000s, with groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad carrying out suicide attacks with horrifying regularity. Thrall notes:
Dany was afraid to send his daughter to school in Jerusalem. Bombs were exploding all over: buses, cafes, markets, nightclubs, and pedestrian boulevards. Nowhere felt safe. With the country burning, there was enormous pressure on the government to do something (142).
One could hardly fault the people of Israel for wanting safety, and there was even a possibility that a wall could work in positive conjunction with the peace process. As Thrall explains, the peace wing of the Israeli government was hopeful that a security boundary could provide the initial basis for a more durable two-state solution: “Israel had no internationally recognized borders with Gaza or the West Bank” (143), and the wall could at least delineate where Israel ended and Palestine began.
Dany was responsible for the engineering portion of the wall, but he had little power to determine its actual contours, which were almost entirely subject to political considerations. Meanwhile, Ibrahim Salada is a well-meaning civil servant who had long ago concluded “that there was no military solution to the conflict” (148), and so it made perfect sense to participate in the Oslo process and support the Palestinian authorities that were set up as a result. Even Beber Vanunu, the Jewish settler, is simply looking for a set of privileges often denied to his fellow Mizrahi and appears to be making all available efforts to show kindness and consideration to his Arab neighbors. None of this, however, matters in the end. Dany may just be a technical expert, but his skills are going to be used to fence people into conditions that many will compare to an open-air prison. Ibrahim cannot do much other than soothe momentary tensions while doing little to dislodge the power of a callous authority. And Beber, as head of the settlement council, is reduced to “making a large banner offering condolences from the community of Adam to the families of the children” (151), a gesture lacking in malice but also lacking in substance. Their behavior can do nothing other than validate the wall and the systems that emerge around it, from the smuggling networks to the segregated highways and the collapsing infrastructure that resulted from dividing what was once a single area into over a hundred isolated islands. The actions of these figures have no effect on the underlying causes, and so all they can do is mitigate some of the effects.
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Daughters & Sons
View Collection
Family
View Collection
Fathers
View Collection
Fear
View Collection
Grief
View Collection
Guilt
View Collection
Hate & Anger
View Collection
Inspiring Biographies
View Collection
Journalism Reads
View Collection
Marriage
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Memory
View Collection
Middle Eastern History
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Religion & Spirituality
View Collection
War
View Collection