52 pages • 1 hour read
Ha-Joon ChangA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
According to free-market economists, fully opening and deregulating financial markets allows for the most efficient and responsive allocation of resources. In this view, the 2008 financial crisis was a one-time, unpredictable blip that need not lead to new regulations.
Chang suggests that the efficiency of financial markets is part of the problem: Although they effectively generate quick profits, they have only increased economic instability. He presents the case of Iceland, which, following the lead of the US and the United Kingdom, privatized and deregulated its financial sector in the late 1990s. For a while, growth accelerated at an incredible rate. However, during the 2008 financial crisis, Iceland’s three largest banks became insolvent, and the country’s economy shrunk more than the economies of other rich countries impacted by the crisis. Other countries that followed similar investment strategies, such as Ireland and Latvia, were likewise more heavily impacted.
The problem with this approach is that they facilitate making profits through financial activities than through real market sectors such as manufacturing. In fact, several manufacturing firms in the US, including General Electric, GM, and Ford, expanded their financial agencies to the point that they became their main source of profit. As the financial sector outpaced real economic activities, the type and number of financial assets expanded. In the housing market, mortgages were packaged into increasingly layered and complex financial assets. Despite the increase in financial assets, the number of real mortgages and economic activity remained unchanged, creating a precarious system whose collapse set off the 2008 financial crisis.
Chang explains that the liquidity of financial assets is both their greatest strength and a major drawback. They allow flexibility of investment, but they are so easily transferable that those who own them are tempted to follow short-term gains. To mitigate this effect, Chang suggests taxes or other regulations to help slow down the flow of financial assets and encourage longer-term investment.
In this essay, Chang makes his most explicit appeal for the theme of Learning from the 2008 Financial Crisis. Chang cleverly situates his discussion of the financial crisis within the context of several other, seemingly unrelated, anecdotes about excessive financial speculation before demonstrating how the experiences of Iceland, GM, and others came to a head in 2008. His decision to include this essay near the end of the book marks it as a kind of culmination of the concepts he introduced and discussed in earlier essays; this essay builds on those principles, such as the conflict between national and commercial interests, as well as the relative value of real versus intangible assets. In Chang’s view, the response to the crisis could be simply the latest bullet point on the list of damages caused by misguided free-market policies or a vital turning point in building a new future.
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Business & Economics
View Collection
Community
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Equality
View Collection
Globalization
View Collection
Immigrants & Refugees
View Collection
Memorial Day Reads
View Collection
Military Reads
View Collection
Nation & Nationalism
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Poverty & Homelessness
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection